Things I did not know
A Voyage of Discovery on the paths of the internet.
On the minibus to work yesterday, there was a trailer for a Radio2 show (“The Class of 2006”) about breakthrough acts of 2006. It mentioned Jose Gonzalez, who was catapulted to fame by the Sony Bravia advert with the bouncy balls in San Francisco. I’d always liked the track, but never bothered to find out who it was. Armed with this new information however, and a quick trip to the BBC website to check the spelling, I hit Google to see what I can find out about him. He has his own website of course (who doesn’t these days?) and an album “Veneer”, which is rather good and now on my iPod.
Also up at the top end of the search results was a link about those iconic adverts themselves (which also have their own website). I’d always assumed both ads (the Balls one in SF, and the Paint one in, as it turns out, Glasgow) were largely CGI. The technology is pretty much good enough to fool our eyes these days, so we increasingly use some sort of “sensibility check” to decide what is real and what is not. Pouring a gazillion balls down the hill towards central SF, and drowning a tower block in multicoloured paint both seemed to be fairly daft things to do in reality, so I’d assumed that while the backgrounds where real, the brightly coloured effects were digital. But I was wrong, it turns out Sony did in fact throw half a million rubber balls down the unmistakeable hills of San Francisco, and “blow up” a tower block with several tonnes of paint. The behind the scenes shorts on the website are worth a look. I think they had a whole lot of fun filming such crazy stunts.
Whenever I go home (and especially at Christmas) I get asked all sorts of obscure questions because I have a reputation of knowing pretty much everything. Not all of them I can answer of course, I don't know everything, but in the spirit of trying I usually go away and find out. Something I wasn't directly asked, but a discussion which caused me to seek to fill another gap in my knowledge was one on "Glace Cherries". I’d always assumed these were cherries that had been de-stoned and sweetened a little. However the consensus of opinion of those much more experienced in cooking and such (my Mum, my Nan, and my Great Aunt) was that “Glace” was some sort of fancy synonym for “fake”, and that they were gelatine or something similar. While I was in the mood for digging around the internet I decided to check. Turns out I was right - they are real cherries, preserved, soaked in syrup and dyed, so now I know a bunch of stuff about the process of making them and their history (at least in the US).
On the minibus to work yesterday, there was a trailer for a Radio2 show (“The Class of 2006”) about breakthrough acts of 2006. It mentioned Jose Gonzalez, who was catapulted to fame by the Sony Bravia advert with the bouncy balls in San Francisco. I’d always liked the track, but never bothered to find out who it was. Armed with this new information however, and a quick trip to the BBC website to check the spelling, I hit Google to see what I can find out about him. He has his own website of course (who doesn’t these days?) and an album “Veneer”, which is rather good and now on my iPod.
Also up at the top end of the search results was a link about those iconic adverts themselves (which also have their own website). I’d always assumed both ads (the Balls one in SF, and the Paint one in, as it turns out, Glasgow) were largely CGI. The technology is pretty much good enough to fool our eyes these days, so we increasingly use some sort of “sensibility check” to decide what is real and what is not. Pouring a gazillion balls down the hill towards central SF, and drowning a tower block in multicoloured paint both seemed to be fairly daft things to do in reality, so I’d assumed that while the backgrounds where real, the brightly coloured effects were digital. But I was wrong, it turns out Sony did in fact throw half a million rubber balls down the unmistakeable hills of San Francisco, and “blow up” a tower block with several tonnes of paint. The behind the scenes shorts on the website are worth a look. I think they had a whole lot of fun filming such crazy stunts.
Whenever I go home (and especially at Christmas) I get asked all sorts of obscure questions because I have a reputation of knowing pretty much everything. Not all of them I can answer of course, I don't know everything, but in the spirit of trying I usually go away and find out. Something I wasn't directly asked, but a discussion which caused me to seek to fill another gap in my knowledge was one on "Glace Cherries". I’d always assumed these were cherries that had been de-stoned and sweetened a little. However the consensus of opinion of those much more experienced in cooking and such (my Mum, my Nan, and my Great Aunt) was that “Glace” was some sort of fancy synonym for “fake”, and that they were gelatine or something similar. While I was in the mood for digging around the internet I decided to check. Turns out I was right - they are real cherries, preserved, soaked in syrup and dyed, so now I know a bunch of stuff about the process of making them and their history (at least in the US).


